Sunday, September 22, 2013

Palin's rant: Bombs Away on Obamacare

I admit it. I've been mad at Sarah Palin for a long time now. I think she blew it when she resigned from being governor of Alaska. That one event made her look like a quitter, someone who couldn't stand up, who just couldn't take it anymore. More importantly, if she couldn't take the job of Alaska's governor, then she obviously couldn't handle the vice presidency. It seemed to me that some people were right about her.

Moreover, she refused to turn herself into someone more serious, choosing instead to become part of a cultural phenom in which she and her family became clowns. There were the reality TV RV hunting trips that lasted one season. It was during that interminable series that we got to hear Sarah's form of swearing--"flippin" for the other f-word--and the slide down the ice sheet whilst mountain climbing, among other ignominious activities, not the least of which was shooting a wolf. From a plane. Even yelling at her kids became an enlightening moment for the rest of us. See. She IS just like us.

Then there were the moments with another reality TV woman, poor Kate Gosselin who had those eight children, and whose husband had left her for another. Sarah's ability to truly bond with women seemed suspect in that epi. Poor Kate, rain coming down, miserable and unhappy with outdoor life, looked like she wanted to shoot herself. Of course, Sarah, aka Frontier Woman, was impatient with Kate, who again, looked like she could slit her wrists, if only the kids weren't there. The kids had a great time, by the way.

Other moments of family life were uninteresting and interesting at the same time. I just couldn't believe that this slice of life in the Palin's house was really happening before us and that she allowed her family this exploitation. Yes, it was like getting down on all fours with them occasionally. They're pretty casual folks, after all.

Then came Dancing with the Stars on which one of her daughters participated. That's just an indignity I wouldn't wish on any of my friends. But the Palins were there, front and center, for the happy and exciting event.

In sum, I think the Palins decided they needed money and simply struck while the iron was hot. Isn't this a typical American story? Someone has to pay for that big motor home. And plane. And house on the lake.

For those reasons, and for one other, I was disappointed in Governor Palin (do you get to keep the office title if you resign that office?). She's stubbornly refused to capitulate to the importance of academia and her participation thereof. I just wonder.Why couldn't she have taken some time to go to graduate school, or studied areas of government affairs, or something? Many people come from remote areas of the world and get "finished," so to speak; I think "polished" is a better word for them, just by moving up and off of their own centers. There's a lack of curiosity that bothers me...and arrogance.

In this piece, http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Government/2013/09/21/palin-ted-cruz-defund-obamacare, she's the feisty, old campaigner whom the right loves so much. She's also very, very bitter. But she does have points. She makes a particular one about the question of closing down the government, mainly that "they" hate us anyway, so it doesn't matter what the Republicans do.Of course, I disagree, knowing that perception in politics is reality, and a shut down government caused by Republicans regardless of their stripes is bad karma. That remains to be seen; thus the reason for defunding Obamacare without closing the government.

Mostly, her piece is pretty hot. She's out in full regalia in support of Senator Ted Cruz of Texas and is challenging the power structure of the party, daring them to ignore Cruz at their own peril. She hit the nail head on with her understanding of Obamacare, The Ruination of America. We all agree there and can move forward on that issue alone. In fact, we all agree on almost everything.

When the dust clears and families are paying upwards of $600 per month in health care premiums, it likely won't matter who's in power. They won't be for long. Our economy probably cannot sustain this expensive boondoggle.

Regardless, Governor Palin is letting everyone know that no matter what "they" say about her--the media, Democrats, other Republicans--she's never going to change. And she's more engaged in that type of rhetoric than ever. There's something about that bravata that inspires me, the citizen...and scares me, the Republican, to death. She's back and I'm not sure I'm happy about that.

Thanks for the read.

Wednesday, August 28, 2013

Jane Fonda's Recidivism: Get a life!

Hanoi Jane, America's Sweetheart's image on tee-shirt
Jane Fonda, aka Hanoi Jane, finally came clean and so much as admitted that she really is unrepentant. She proved it by wearing a tee-shirt displaying a defiant and young Fonda at work in Vietnam, demoralizing U.S. troops in 1972 when interviewing and discussing her role in a new movie.

I thought she actually apologized for nosing in on foreign affairs some time ago, didn't she?

Evidently, she didn't really mean it--her fingers must have been crossed behind that yellow-striped back of hers--because these days, her response when asked about her wearing the inappropriate tee-shirt is, "They (the vets) need to get a life."

Tragic.

What kind of ego, what kind of low character does (and continues to do) what she has done? Think about it.

Wearing this kiss off tee-shirt is not just a silly, sad and unexpected response to one to two questions about an indiscretion of youth. It is a painful revelation of a rather immature, although aging woman who seems incapable of telling the truth.

Point in fact. When I was in my early thirties, in the 80s, I used her exercise books and tapes. They were helpful and extremely challenging. There were two or three of them, one of them aerobics and another was a step routine, the other I can't remember. I probably worked out to them two to three times a week, when I wasn't running four miles. Indeed, I was in pretty good shape. Frankly, however, I didn't carry on this heavy routine just for health's sake; I was addicted to it as well as using it to support my eating habit. Having always loved eating, it worked fine. But there were always areas that didn't respond as well. Fonda's body, though, always was perfect. Right on, I thought to myself. If she can do it, I can do it too. I just worked harder.
Fonda to Vets, "Get a life."

Someone might ask, well, if you didn't respect Fonda, why in the world would you buy her tapes? I'm not sure, except maybe I thought she had changed, or that I could forgive her. I don't know really. But I did know I liked the results, so I stayed with her. It was stunningly obvious the workouts she performed were working for her. Her brand had changed from traitor to harmless celebrity person in a leotard with pink and purple stripes.I can't believe I was so unprincipled at the time. I bought it all.

Much later, come to find out (no one knew), Ms. Fonda was in and out of plastic surgery suites for all kinds of liposuction and tummy tucks, arm contouring, you name it, she had it done. So, not only was she a traitor who refused to own up to her treasonous behavior, she was a snake oil salesman making zillions on her new brands of self-improvement. In the meantime, she was fooling vulnerable women into thinking all they had to do was one more rep of this or that exercise and they'll look like Jane.

No one looks like Jane except what the unauthentic Jane asks her doctors to make her look like. I feel sorry for the women who are dealing with body dysmorphic disorder, anorexia or who had eating disorders. She really did a number on them. I honestly don't see the difference between Fonda and some of the baseball and football players who use steroids. It's all a sham any way you slice it.

Then there's the unauthentic time when she became a Christian. As a Christian myself, I can't comment on that more than it seems if one is truly repentant for one's missing the mark, should not one stand up foursquare and admit it, instead if insulting the people whom you have hurt? It seems to be another deep flaw in Fonda's character, or perhaps it's a developmental issue--that she would consciously demean and attack Vietnam veterans and/or those who have already been so sorely affected by that damnable war. It's as if they're ex-husbands or someone she has total disregard and disgust for. They don't need a replay of her hard hearted treatment. There's nothing like humility when faced with public disgrace. She should learn from that, but her ego is so huge, I can't see that ever happening.

Moreover, her portrayal of Nancy Reagan in the above mentioned movie, "The Butler," holds a strange irony for me. Ms. Fonda said in an interview that "...she happened to know that Mrs. Reagan knew she was playing her in the movie..." She says this with an almost teenaged nanner nanners as she relates breathlessly this fact to the interviewer.

Ironically, it seems she yearns for a type of legitimacy by suggesting that because Mrs. Reagan not only knows about her role, she encourages it somehow. What difference does that make? In other words, Mrs. Reagan, because she thinks you're a good selection to play a cameo role, somehow approves of your dismal form of participatory politics? It's like the Capitol One credit card ad where Alec Baldwin is insisting because he's played a pilot in a movie he's capable of flying an airplane. It's really Freudian when you look at it.

This is so Fonda. I'm ashamed of myself for spending any money on her. But I can repent by advising Ms. Fonda that she is going upstream and will die on the rocks if she continues her head strong defiance. Some huge and uncomfortable truths are always at the end of big stories such as hers. This type of ego driven strutting has all the authenticity of a lightening storm at Disneyland. The real stuff comes when there aren't any lies left to tell.

Thanks for the read.

Thursday, August 15, 2013

Artists and sentinels: epilogue

The end of the story

My father and mother, Andrew and Lois Layman, moved from a gorgeous 3500 square foot Dilby Tudor in Kansas City, Missouri to a ten-acre farm in Johnson County, Kansas. The place had some major barns and chicken houses and a lovely redo house. They came there with me and my older brother, their second family. Their first family, my sibs, were married and off on their own. We arrived when I was in second grade. Dad commuted 25 miles to his office (the plant) in KC.

Dad, aka Chief Layman, was with Bendix for 30 years. He was active in Lions Club, a 32nd Degree Mason, involved in Toastmasters, Managers Club, an elder in Country Club Christian Church in Kansas City, along with endless other farm and community related activities such as sharing pastures with neighbors, labor and old tricks he had learned as a boy. Our neighbors respected him because of his know how and that he wasn't another one of "those gentlemen farmers."

I think my love for the outdoors came from my tagging along with him on those outings to the neighbors to pick up livestock or go to the wheat fields to take in grain. My dad also taught me how to shoot, although guns were not a big deal in our house. We had a 22-caliber rifle that was kept over the back door transom on the porch and that was it. I think a broom would have been more efficient--and quicker.

My love of sports came from my time with Dad. We'd go to KU basketball games together, enjoyed pro and college football and shared together the general love of sports. That carried on till the day he died. I could always count on my dad to talk about sports with me.

Living in the country was an adjustment for me. I was afraid in the middle of the night. The casualness of my folks' attitude toward security stunned me. Yes, they sort of locked the back door in summer with one of those things that looks like a question mark that hangs on a loop; however, the door was a screen door. I realized later it was Russians my dad was after, not Clutter murderers. I suppose he was confident he could handle anything that came along, or that the odds were such that nothing would happen.

I did have so many advantages, such as owning a horse and living a wonderful existence in a beautiful woodland with hills and valleys. The Native American past of the area provided plenty of arrowheads and artifacts for kids to dig for and hunt. Exploration was a large part of my early life.

After my brother went to college, I became an only child for five years. That was not a bad thing. My folks kept up the chase and taxi service during that time--not an easy thing for parents who had an active kid late in life. How many cheerleading practices and games, how many newspaper meetings?

Then, thankfully for everyone concerned, I went off to college.

Mother and Daddy were alone, for the first time in how many years. Daddy retired and they kept up their "normal" routine, although I'm sure the adjustment was enormous for my mother. They bickered about moving to the desert in Arizona for the winters, about moving to town, about this and that. Meanwhile, they were visiting their children who were scattered about the country, enjoying themselves. I wish I could say that after so many years in retirement they figured it out. Regretfully, that Air Stream simply wasn't in the cards. Not in this lifetime.

It was almost summer, a hot and humid, mid-afternoon. Dad was mowing a neighbor's field--a flat place between a marble quarry and a hedge row where I used to ride my horse, Billy--about two miles away from the farm. It seems he had lain down under a tree, the tractor gearbox in park with the mower blades still spinning, his straw, panama-style hat on his chest, and his hands were clasped, fingers intertwined across his midsection as if resting, or maybe praying. There, under a silvery leafed sugar maple, he died.

One of our dear neighbor's teenaged sons found him.

The date was June 15th, 1978. The following Sunday was Father's Day.

My greatest fear had come true. He was gone.

Thanks for the read.


Wednesday, August 14, 2013

No more Clintons, Bushes, Cheneys, Obamas, et al.

Legacies. We're surrounded by them.

They're psuedo hibernating, some of them, in their respectable foundations--like Hillary at the Clinton Foundation, coming out only to sniff the air, clearly avoiding Washington snits, and then returning just long enough to have people wonder, "Where is Hillary?". Don't forget Chelsea.

It is in these lairs that the betters among us fulfill their beauty/fitness routines to get in shape for the fight. This foundation scheme is very convenient and is indeed a literal platform from which to spring forward towards the biggest fight of them all: America's presidency.

Then, there's Jeb Bush. And the nephew, George Bush. Why is it, everyone's a candidate, just like Grandpa and Uncle Georges? Enough already. Can't they find real jobs?

Liz Cheney? Okay, I guess. Another legacy, as if she somehow deserves to be where she is by virtue of genealogy.

And one Obama is enough for anyone.

What I like to see in the Republican Party are the new lines and new faces. I like when they kick the president where he lives and try to stop his illegal executive pronouncements like delays in Affordable Care Act.

I enjoy watching the Legislative branch of our government actually performing its job, riding herd over the Executive branch. It's absolutely thrilling to me to see our freshmen congressmen stand up and speak truth to power...and then follow through again and again. These new Turks are serious and seem uninterested in the core power of the old GOP and their rules. I admit to having to renege on my view of nepotism because the son of Ron Paul, Senator Rand Paul of Kentucky, is tearing up Washington. He's running for president. Then there's Senators Ted Cruz from Texas and  Mike Lee of Utah, both attorneys, who are convinced we can name this Affordable Healthcare Act a turkey before it even gets started, and hoping to defund the entire thing.

It is interesting that the President is using the guilt card as he stumps for implementation of the ACA.  He likes to say that we Republicans are denying some 30 million people from receiving their coverage. Of course, his metrics are as phony as his rhetoric. What he should be saying is this: your coverage is going to cost you yearly anywhere between $6500 individually and $12,500 for a family. And you have no choice. Those are the real facts. The old guard in the GOP seem to be oblivious to these issues while they hang on to the maddening status quo. In other words, they've given up, as usual, to the drumbeat that the Progressives have kept going, as if there's no other option.

In addition, considering perception in politics is reality, we in the GOP simply cannot risk poor PR--again--by shutting down the government. Surely this matter can be played more deftly than we've done so in the past. Indeed, some Republicans are arguing that the last shut down wasn't all that bad, that we gained seats in Congress, and it all came out in the wash. Be that as it may, the perception overall, was unfortunate, and the low information voter remembers those low lights, instead of the principled debate that the old GOP put forth. One still hears how the bad Republicans blinked, while the Dems and President Clinton played it to the hilt. Let's not make that mistake again.

Rinos need to understand once again that compromising with Progressives is a fool's errand. Some of the new blood in Congress gets that. Whether it be about Obamacare or immigration, we've been had over and over, and the new strong hearts of the party are correct in their impulses to stand firm. Out of all of these new voices, we can hear some strains of exciting and encouraging arguments, while the old is so old that it creaks from its constant preoccupation with twentieth century ideas and solutions, most of which belongs in a trash heap.

The new, on the other hand--those in the GOP who understand governing from strength, are on the cusp of change, ready to relieve the constrictive hold of the middletons in our midst. It is time not to compromise for compromise's sake; rather, the time has come for the GOP to acknowledge a new electorate with a new understanding of what it is to be a twenty-first century citizen of the United States.

New leadership, new ideas and new policies are needed to carry forth a reborn America--one which recalls the greatness of our country--first in the world in all things--as it used to be when we were not ashamed and guilt ridden because of the words of a few minority bosses and race hustlers.

In my theory of "Everything's Wrong in America," a huge axis change must occur. That begins with regular people beginning to understand the old ways of establishment politics. Of course, term limits are a part of that change. The professional politician is the bane of our lives.

Meanwhile, HRA, Hillary Rodham Clinton, is poised to be coronated Queen.

Dear Lord, I'm so sick of her. Why must we have these infernal personalities who are no more caring of you and I than she is of a bunch of animals in a zoo? It is the structure of the system, as well as their deep egos and greed (just how much are the Clintons worth now?), that we are subjected to the constant barrage of their politics and activities.

The Democrat Party has become nothing more than a clown car pouring out entrenched, tired, shameful personalities as old and predictable as ever. The Republicans? Well, fortunately, we've somehow found it in our beings to elect a few stars.

Out with the old; in with the new.

Thanks for the read.



Monday, July 29, 2013

The Artists and the Sentinels

The Artists

My assault on my five-year screenwriting career began as I pored over the documents, records and stories of family members during a long genealogical research project. Being a writer, I couldn't help but dramatize in my head the events that I read about in the their lives. There were dozens of documents from which to pull great stories

However, as rich as the data I had before me, they were daunting, and truthfully I was ambivalent about genre. How shall I get these tales told? A novel, short stories? It wasn't until about six months into my research that I was wakened in the middle of the night in full sweat following a dreadful nightmare. As vividly and brightly as the sun rises in the east, I realized the dream was about my great grandmother, a Quaker, who lived in Chester County, Pennsylvania, and her father, who was born there in 1670. The ramification about the truth of her life was a compelling story and a changer of material facts in our family tree. The truth was a story-and-a half. It had to be told.

It was then that I decided I would attempt my first screenplay, and it would be a suspense/thriller.

To start, I bought every screenwriting book on the shelves, the latest screenwriting software and enrolled in as many premier screenwriting seminars as I could afford.

Getting my presence out in Hollywood, I searched for and discovered the most popular online forums and message boards, becoming more than just a lurker. Soon I was participating in screenwriters' online conversations, discerning who knew what and whom. The pros became easy to spot. I was beginning to get excellent assistance and guidance from other writers who traded war stories--and even making a fool of myself on the message boards; but, I was learning nonetheless. I got caught up in a few arguments and found out who my friends were.

I devoured the trade magazines and each day was consumed with writing and rewriting, outlining and rewriting.

Did I mention rewriting? It seemed endless. Still does. This is when I remember Dorothy Parker's saying that no one loves to write, he only loves having written.

Finally, the finished product, or what I was convinced was a finished product, “Disowned and Dismembered” (D&D) was ready for its “coverage.” Coverage is what Hollywood calls reading and critiquing in order to receive one of the following actions: Pass, Consider, or Accept. I paid a consultant (reader) for my coverage; some writers do and most don't because they really can't afford it. Studios have their own coverage/reader departments.

It’s here I need to say that what most newcomers don’t know, and don’t want to know, and don’t hear is screenwriters usually don’t have a Consider or an Accept until he's written twelve to fifteen scripts, if at all. By that time, the wife has left, or the writer has died, or the house has been repossessed and the family is gone, leaving nothing but peanut butter, crackers, Fido and a notice from Southern Cal Ed that the computer will be cut off in two days. I was blessed to be supported by a great husband who understands the creative process and is kind of a workaholic himself. But writers never should kid themselves; it's more than a full -time job and it takes every minute of the day.

Besides placing the script on a service that allows producers and other developers to read my log line (a 25- word or less synopsis of the plot), I also sent it to my cousin, a director who had a few movies under his belt. He liked it a lot; it was about his family after all. But in Hollywood no one sends scripts on to their Hwood pals from unknowns unless he’s really sure. It’s just not done. I sort of knew that, but was hoping anyway. My work of art got stuck at the bottom of his own personal pile of other masterpieces. In fact, I don’t know if his pile consisted of the scripts that he wrote or the rest of the scripts he got from friends and his other cousins who fancy themselves great screenwriters. He finally admitted to me that "he didn't know how to get a movie made."

Dang.

I got many hits on my log lines, but still no takers. My coverage was good, but no takers. I got great notes. I got read by five producers. They all said it would not sell at the box office, but they loved it. Still. It was too American. A story about a rape of a Quaker girl in 1723?  No one would come to see it, except my relatives. Well, duh. That's why I added all the thriller stuff. Duh.

I didn't care about their take on the American thing. I knew the American thing would always sell. How ridiculous. I know America. It probably just wasn't very good, not well written enough, a mechanical problem, a technical issue with the plot, I told myself...arrogantly.

So, I threw D&D on the shelf and started research on another American screen play. This one was called “Shock Tx”, an-in-your-face American action drama set in pre-WWII Indianapolis.

My dream cast: Matthew McConaghey is my leading man, the Indy race car driver in 1937, whose need for do-it-yourself shock treatments between races in his Gasoline Alley garage becomes a problem; Jon Voight is his aristocratic physician father; Jessica Lange is Voigt's wife; some gorgeous blonde ice queen I’ve yet to decide on plays a Nazi psychiatrist; and Ben Affleck rounds out the cast as Matthew’s alcoholic shrink brother.

Both brothers are in love with the Nazi doc. I can’t say what balances this story out, but something happens to keep the family’s name and reputation in tact. This story is full of wonderful race scenes in the 30s at Indy, plus some fantastic bad guy action and old rivalries. Many scenes take place in a creepy old mental hospital.

I guess that script wasn't very good either. It must have been the writing and the presentation. I still believe in the story. Maybe they didn't like the Bugattis, Mazerattis and other ancient Indy cars or the crowd scenes where the flagpole is struck by lightening and the huge American flag gracefully falls on the grandstand full of spectators.

One reader, a woman 38-years old, told me she didn't think people today would relate to WWII stories. They seem too unrealistic, she said. Another mentioned she thought they were too far fetched—she didn't think that people actually took their sons to the train station to see them off to war as I had portrayed it in a scene in Shock Tx. I mentioned that that particular scene was from my own experience when my family took my older brother to Union Station in Kansas City in 1951 to send him off to Korea. I was six at the time. I remember also picking him in 1952 when he returned.

Good thing I didn't model the departure after the time my next brother went to war and was sent to Vietnam. In 1963, my mother and I traveled to New York and saw him off on a huge troop ship full of soldiers. I'm afraid the reader wouldn't have believed that one either. As I recall, afterwards we had dinner at the Dixie Hotel and enjoyed The Johnny Carson Show at Rockefeller Center.

When I used the name “Christopher” in D&D, one of the readers told me to change the name because it was too “modern” for 1670. I replied I couldn't because that really was my grandfather’s given name—in 1670.

All right, then. I finally believed them. There’s no market for Americana in Hollywood. They had me convinced! After four or five years, I gave up on the art of screenwriting.

I stopped writing for Hollywood.  Instead, I started a successful blog, Planet California, and began writing for America about American culture, politics and me. That was thirteen years ago.


The Sentinels

My father, Andrew A. Layman, who weighed 13 pounds when he was born on the 4th of July of 1905, got drunk once. My father gambled to excess. Once. His doctor told him to quit smoking once at which time Dad threw the near full cigarette pack into his dresser drawer where they remained till the day he died twenty years later. My father did nothing to excess.

As a little girl, the fondest memory I have is sitting on my dad's lap and leaning up against his barrel chest, listening to his heartbeat. There was no greater security in my world, and no greater fear that is would someday go away. His massive presence was so powerful that I was never afraid when he was around. No sane man would start a fight with my father unless he could finish it. I never realized that power until when I was around weak men when I got older. I also found out through him that there is more to strength than muscular power.

There was no one like him. I was able to point to him proudly as my father; he was so different than the others in his looks, his gracious, elegant dress style, his impeccable manners and who he was as a man. He never embarrassed me in any way.

Local Sports Hero
My father made a vow that none of his children would ever have to pay their way through college. None ever did. That’s because he came from a family who did not value education and success. Rather they were professional farmers who had no time for niceties and anything resembling warmth and love. My father, the oldest of nine siblings, decided early in his life that he simply was not interested in the hard work of a corporate farm. He escaped that life and never looked back by putting himself through school and earning two degrees.

When you were as popular, handsome and talented as Andy, you got yourself a ticket to Purdue University at least for a year. To this day, I'm not quite sure what caused him to leave after the first year, but it might have something to do with doing things at least once. What that once was never became clear to me. That was back in the days when kids like me had to mind their own business and didn't ask their parents a lot of questions. He probably ran out of money.

Dad spent the rest of his college career at Indiana Teachers College in Danville, Indiana where he made his way through working in a hotel firing furnaces and earning four varsity letters and receiving two Bachelor of Science degrees. He also set the state collegiate record for shot put one year, a couple of other records and was able to maintain his grades. In addition, he was eligible to go to the Olympics, but the teams did not have the money to send the athletes at that time.

Following his graduation and then teaching a couple of years, he married my mother, Lois Spray, in 1928 after having met her three weeks earlier. That is probably the rashest, most impetuous, most immature action my dear father had ever taken in his life as well as probably the happiest and best decision he ever made.

Mother had an interesting way of telling the story that he was engaged to someone else when they met. By the way, it's from her side of the family, the English, anti war one, that I fell heir to the smug gene. Sometimes, I use it as well as she ever could.

I remember Mother often referring to Tom Wolfe's novel, You Can't Go Home Again as she spoke of those days (before they met) and Dad’s more unfortunate choice of schools to debut his coaching career was his own alma mater. I'm afraid his time there was short lived as his teams had not lived up to the hype of the home town hero's own press clippings.

That didn't last long. By that time he was married to Mother a year, he had a new baby and was in another inky dinky Indiana small town. Mother was pregnant again with my sister. It was the Depression. I don’t think anyone was too happy.

Dad and his little family moved to a few other towns and by the time my next older brother was born in 1940, my father had taught for fifteen years, coached a number of championship basketball, football, baseball and track teams in Indiana high schools.

Teacher first, coach second
Separated by less than fifty miles and ahead of the famous Coach John Wooden by just a few years, men like Coach Wooden and Andy Layman gave a generation of American coaching its identity and backbone. They made Indiana basketball the way ahead for lots of boys who didn't have another way out. If you've ever seen an interview with one of these kids, you’ll understand this basic theory of life: It starts with the clinic of how to put on your socks. You can't do anything if your socks don't feel right. Dad always said he was a teacher first and a coach second.

Those Indiana farm kids learned rules and gamesmanship, American history, manners, sportsmanship, honor, chivalry, how to become more by watching what their coaches did. They even learned how to dress, how to shine their shoes, how to treat a lady, how to talk. They learned everything by example. They also got a look at my mother and thought just maybe if they got off the farm went to college they could get a pretty, classy lady too.*

School rivalries grew as towns identified with their coaches and teams. The pressure was beyond great. If a coach won he was a king; if he lost he'd better move him and his family on. The good news was he had four chances to prove himself in many cases--most little schools had one coach for all four sports. However, there was no doubt Indiana basketball was king.

A young, popular, successful family man with a nifty family who had everything going for him, even in the depths of the Great Depression, defined my parent's entire greater generation and was expressed by their moods of cautious optimism. They had friends, played Mah Jong every Saturday evening, and yes, they even had some fun. They dealt with the same issues as we, yes, even fellow teachers who happened to be gay--I remember Mother and Daddy talking about a couple of "old maids" who were on the faculty, but as is typical, it was absolutely no one's business. There was always something going on because people are people no matter where they are. Mostly, other people's business was left at just that and gossip wasn't allowed in our house.

Yet a man with so much else who literally could not feed his family, who had to move them all to Gary, Indiana in the summers so he could slave in the steel mills, settle them temporarily in shacks--on the beach of Lake Michigan-- then they had to turn around and move back so he could coach the following fall. Or he painted barns to make ends meet. Now, it sounds like a fantasy when I hear about how poor people were in the thirties.

Mother, teaching third grade, was still circling the block on the way home from school so Mr. Smith, the grocer, didn't spot her and hit her up for the 15 cents she owed for last night's hamburger. She would probably be slicing potatoes and figuring how the heck she was going to make hamburger gravy taste good again tonight. At least they had the tomatoes from the weekend to keep everyone from getting scurvy. Even mailing that postcard to her sister was a luxury.

Things were changing. Mother would be going to Grandma’s in Indianapolis and stay because she was due to deliver my brother in August of 1940. It was so hard on Mother and Daddy to be apart, but they did what had to do.

Of course, that year Daddy had won another fantastic championship and Mother and Daddy still didn't have any money. Dad dearly loved his job, his boys, his teams and his town, and the town loved him; but, the time had come to do something different. I often think of the pain he must have felt when he said goodbye to that wonderful life.

He didn't really realize it then, but his most of his boys would soon to be off to Africa, to Europe and the Pacific and his heart would have been broken over and over again anyway.

DuPont Nemours
Hitler had invaded Poland in 1939.

The famous German genius/scientist, Albert Einstein, wrote an important letter of alarm to President Roosevelt informing him about an outrageously dangerous weapon technology and that our lives-- yours, mine, and everyone’s--would be changed forever because of it. He told him America had to do something and fast. That was when we thought America was good for something and had certain obligations..

Dad had the prerequisite education, major leadership experience to become part of something very important and special. His personal reputation was spotless and his way with people and steady demeanor meant that all they needed to do was plug him in and turn him on.

Dupont Nemours came after and hired my dad. They sent him to the FBI Academy for three months, and then in a few more months he was moved along the rest of the family to Richland, Washington, a tiny berg on the banks of the Columbia River in the desert. Mother said she thought they had arrived on the moon. They might as well have, according to my sister. Everyone lived in barracks for a while until their homes could be built, er, I mean, fabricated.

The town of Richland started out at about 3000 people in 1943, the little county seat of Benton. The Manhattanites liked its remote location nestled down in the valley along with that nice power resource of the Columbia River. It was a perfect place to make plutonium for a bomb. No one knew that but a “couple of people” like Enrico Fermi (our neighbor), and his scientists, General Leslie Groves, and of course, Dad.

When Uncle Sam moved in, there was little the townies could do. The population of Richland, Kennewick and Pasco, a tri-city area, grew to about 30,000 in a little over a year. The Mahattan Project was in full bloom.

Typical problems occurred with fast growth, disparate people and quick planning. Law enforcement was handled as well as could be expected with two departments—the Civil and the Federal run by the same people—my Dad’s. It was a tricky job as it entailed more than just law enforcement. It also consisted of extreme security issues near and on the plant reservation. The security division even had to deal with Jim Crow laws on the books, an impossible and immoral issue for good men like my dad.

Lots of personal and human interest stories came out of that time in Richland. I've heard so many of them. My family was quite happy in Richland. One of the tales involves a bunch of my older brother's friends and him placing one of the security vehicles on the roof of one of  Dad's stations. My sis told me Dad just laughed. That sounds like Dad. Since I'm the baby of the family, I feel like I got snookered by Mother Nature out of sixteen years of my folks' life, so hearing these stories are bittersweet for me and I always wished I had been there too.

Rumors were rampant as to what was being manufactured at Hanford. Speculation was strong that it was toilet paper. No one could talk about it because of the security issues. They were serious about it. Toilet paper worked just fine.

The dangerous post war period
That war was over. A new one had begun. The Cold One. Research at Hanford continued and things nuclear moved at a breathtaking pace. In the meantime, I joined the family. I was born one week after the second bomb had been dropped on Nagasaki, Japan.

Later, one day in 1949, Dad called Mother, and asked her how many clean shirts he had in his drawer;  he was off to Kansas City in an hour.

Dad became the security executive for the Bendix Aviation Corporation, a major contractor for aviation systems employing 8000 people. It was not until much later, after he was gone, that I discovered the scope of his civil defense responsibilities. I knew none of this until years later and only until I read about different events in the newspaper, or searched in newly released unclassified documents.

My father shielded our family from every bit of it. I learned my politics from my experience and through reading and debating others, not from anything he ever said or imparted or inferred from his experience on the job. Furthermore, I never noticed a difference in manner or mood if he knew I was around. "Steady" had a new exemplar in my dad.

The musician, writers, intellectuals, poseurs
It is in Mother’s family that the political ambivalence and anti war strain comes through even though it is her father, a staunch Republican who is my guiding light in my political writing.

The Quaker and mainline Protestant antiwar roots run deep, even to the point that my great grandfather, family legend has it, threatened my grandfather that he would not send him to college if he enlisted in the Spanish American War. My poor great grandfather’s stiff-necked promise came true, much to the shock of many in the family and without;

Regardless, my grandfather simply sloughed off the his unkind gesture and kept up his part of bargain for his country by becoming a remarkable citizen, after he served in The Philippines and contracting chronic malaria. There was no antiwar "nonsense" for that Republican.

There are some in my extended family who have always carried the anti war bug. They talk about the heroism of the protesters of war and those who avoid war at all costs. I've heard them say they think America is a terrible place because we dropped the bombs on Japan. They would do so with full knowledge that my father was in the same room at the time.

Everyone is entitled to his opinion.

Maybe they haven’t figured it out the same way I have, that sometimes you must give up something big to keep something bigger. That there are things you might have to lose, like my Grandpa did when his old man said no to his patriotism.

Andy always kept silent during the political rants and hollers emanating from the dining room. I still can picture him as he stands on his front porch from which he gazes across his rolling northeastern Kansas limestone hills and pastures of cattle and grass. Yonder in Missouri lay silos with nuclear war heads destined to be pumped up to the top, huge bombers at rest in their hangers, other man made secrets and truths Hollywood once said, "you can't handle!" With his years of experience and knowledge, one can only imagine what he thinks of the rest of us.

What I know for sure is this: artists dream and talk while the sentinels guard and watch.

Thanks for the read.



*What I didn't know until a year ago is about the time my dear, classy mother was kicked out of a gymnasium at a basketball game for a mouthy exchange with a referee. The story goes that Dad's boss, Mr. Albright, the principal of the school, simply told Mother, "Now, Lois. We can't have this." Nothing more was ever said. What my dad said--or didn't say-- is not known.

Tuesday, July 16, 2013

One drop and you're black

Chris Rock said it.

When Harvard Professor Henry Louis Gates, Jr., the fellow best known for the infamous Beer Summit at the White House, also known for his PBS show "Finding Your Roots," told Mr. Rock that he had a bunch of American Indian and Scotch Irish blood in him, he reacted with that very defensive, and somewhat hostile and emotional response.

Of course, no one may really dictate how a person defines himself. One gets to name himself, or change his name, call himself an African-American, a White-American (Mulatto), Caucasian, etc. Who are we to make such a determination? In America you can do what you want.

It is interesting that nearly a quarter of African-Americans have Native American blood in them; and about another fifty percent have a humongous amount of Caucasian in them. President Obama's one of them. Most of these folks consider themselves black...or African-American and having grown up in a predominately black community explains that identity choice.

The distinct pathology of the reaction to George Zimmerman's acquittal is a lot like the one drop and you're black remark. It makes no sense. An entire community of people who are so unreasonable, so out there that they can't think straight and thus, continue to challenge the status quo race relations in this country, which really aren't so bad these days when we consider the huge strides made in the last forty years. Good grief, we have a black president!

I can't help but think that regardless of the current occupant of the White House, there's really nothing that people can do to satisfy this particular group of people. The outlandishness of this protesting class is so sick, so off kilter, so counter intuitive, ridiculously unreasonable and illogical, that no one with a legalistic, sane mind can deal with them. They're the reason laws are written and enacted. They operate on dangerous emotion and negative energy and hero worship of black bosses who are exploiting the more stupid among them. It is an evil attempt to thwart rule of law. The protesters are psychically overwrought and whipped up by a corrupt and lawless Justice Department, an Executive Branch of the Federal Government and the local County Attorney, as well as disingenuous politicians who are also pressured by the president and the Justice Department.

Even liberal-minded Alan Dershowitz, who if he were dead, would be rolling over in his grave knowing that the Zimmerman case has nothing to do with race and profiling under the law.

Nevertheless, ideologues in the mainstream media who are motivated by and operate from white guilt are undergirding this insane and fantastical, pathological myth about the facts in the case. (And then there are the lawyers-turned-commentators like Nancy Grace who is obnoxious and disgraceful in her anti-Zimmerman zeal.) It's the old two plus two equals five distraction and distortion of the Left.

Meanwhile, again. Nothing works; nothing pleases them; and nothing will ever change.How can they be part of the conversation when they can't talk--or even think straight!

Having the first black president wasn't even enough. Nothing ever is. They need to be ignored.

Thanks for the read.

Thursday, July 4, 2013

The Texas abortion debate

When the Progressives in Texas say the Republicans just want to reduce the number of abortions by passing the Texas Abortion bill, they're absolutely right. It's not stealth, nor is it pulling the wool over anyone's eyes. That's what the pro life movement wants: fewer abortions.

The fact is taking the life of an innocent child at any time is wrong; but, by passing this bill and adding the ability to take one at or after twenty weeks is as sick and degenerate as any civil society can practice.

There's a new Texas State Democrat star--Wendy Davis, who filibustered and succeeded in keeping this bill from becoming law. That made her the martyr du jour--the Progressives love their martyrs--and got her on Meet the Press on Sunday. Her pontificating on women's rights  as they relate to this abortion bill--the one she singlehandedly kept from affecting every last woman on earth--makes my teeth hurt.

Unfortunately for her, and womanhood in general, Governor Perry of Texas reintroduced the bill for another try. That same day, to be sure, the opposition reaffirmed their hatred for the bill and came out in force to protest. This time, I understand that they shouted "Hail Satan!" in response to the pro life/Christian groups who stood across the street counter protesting by singing that rabble rousing hit, "Amazing Grace."

Hail Satan?

So, how has this Roe v Wade argument gone from a sixteen-week limit on abortions to the twenty weeks that is being fought for today? I must have been asleep. I admit, I've let my guard down on the social issues we've been facing, mostly because I hate to deal with them...and, I've been lazy.

I've read the Texas bill. No where within does it take away the so-called mother's rights, nor does it block a mother's ability to have the abortion. In fact, it simply calls for procedures to be instituted which enhances the subject's safety. The pro abortion people say it closes down some clinics because of those safety guidelines. Again, it's no secret that the authors of this bill and the people of Texas want fewer abortions.

But, something has changed in the public square and state houses in this country and that is, in fact, this: there is a strident, heartless tone in these fights.

People who used to think that killing a baby outside the womb was a barbarity now are actually lined up to repeat the drum beat of these murderous procedures in the name of a woman's right to her own body. Of course, at time of conception or at twenty weeks, a woman's right to her own body ceases as that small being's begins. Those underlying precepts are the arguments at which all conversation begins and ends from the perspective of the pro life community. Unfortunately, empirically speaking, the more secular one is, the more pro abortion one tends to be. In talking or arguing with someone like this, withstanding insults about your ability to "understand" science and biology* and establishing brain power and intellectual parity with the conversant can take time and patience. If one is lucky, and the debate gets rolling, the poor pro abortion side eventually gets left in the dust with his empty sack of sadness and the dark reality of death.

In our new world of  what I have come to call "Everything's Wrong," we Christians must stand for something. I might as well begin with this.

Thanks for the read.


*Inronically, it was through my college microbiology and chemistry classes that I understood that life begins at conception.




Wednesday, June 12, 2013

Stick to your knitting!

There was a time not terribly long ago that a group of about maybe 245 to 350 people--scientists, army and security specialists and a couple of politicians--were able to keep a secret about America putting together an atomic bomb program that was as complicated as it would be controversial. My father was one of them.

The success of the Manhattan Project depended very much upon the discretion and patriotism of those people, and the integrity of the structure of the grand plan of compartmentalization of work areas across the country consisting of secret cities and facilities and areas which brought about the development and manufacture of plutonium in Hanford, Washington, where I was born. Another fuel, Uranium 235, produced in Oak Ridge, Tennessee, was being developed as a vital component needed to actually set off the test bomb in the desert below Los Alamos, New Mexico. The real thing came to fruition and finally were dropped and exploded on the people of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan. Of course, those terrible weapons of mass destruction finished the war with Japan and, thus, because of their potency and savagery set up the Cold War with the Soviet Union and a new national security paradigm. In addition, the possession of such technology reinforced America's claim with the Soviets as bipolar powers, almost equal one to the other.

I've often wondered how my dad, who headed up Hanford's security division, would view today's security establishment. I believe he would think there could be no Manhattan Project, partly because of electronic surveillance capabilities, in addition to the lack of  integrity of participating individuals who would sell their mothers for fame or fortune.

Today, there too seems to be a lot of consternation about outsourcing government security jobs to outfits like Booz Allen Hamilton and others. I don't share it.
Compartmentalization of knowledge, to me, was the very heart of security. My rule was simple and not capable of misinterpretation--each man should know everything he needed to know to do his job and nothing else. Adherence to this rule not only provided an adequate measure of security, but it greatly improved overall efficiency by making our people stick to their knitting. General Leslie R. Groves, head of the Manhattan Project
You see that outsourcing is not new, and its advantages seem obvious. The Manhattan Project served as a model for post war national security and is used today. One major difference is the shear volume of top secret security clearances: there are 1.2 million of them, whereas years before only a few thousands carried a top secret classification.

So, I find it difficult to blame outsourcing for our snoopy problems. It is more likely that the ethos of our times that say that self-important individuals such as Edward Snowden believe they can effect some major change by blowing off their top secret classifications and enter the world of Assange and Manning into some sort of espionage immortality.

That being said, I also have great reservations about the NSA programs and the Patriot Act. I didn't like it when President Bush started it, and I don't like it now. Too much has gone wrong. Too much information. Too much access. Too much. Even with our new, asymmetrical warfare model, the Patriot Act goes too far. We must begin profiling Islamists who seek to kill us, not listen in on Grandma Schottenheimer and Sister Sue.

When my dad watched out for bad guys,  like Soviet spies (American) Theodore Hall and (German) Klaus Fuchs, both physicists who were working in the "areas," there was no need to listen in on fellow citizens. The "enemy" then was not you and me.

Now Americans have become the enemy in the metadata revolution. Every bit of telecon information is currently connected to that great data center in the sky (or in a gigantic repository in Utah). There is another program, called Echelon, owned by Great Britain which is the next step up in data collection and has been utilized  by our government for years now. Do not kid yourselves; this information is already being accessed, whether the phone calls are listened in on or not. The exponential speed at which data is put together into dossier fashion is astounding. My fear is our government--the Obama regime especially--will continue to lie and cover up to the nth degree, leaving our civil rights in the rear view mirror.

Quaint as it is, I wish we had knitting to stick to.

Thanks for the read.

Monday, May 27, 2013

Soldiers and Sailors

Those who gave


Today, I pay tribute to the members of my immediate and extended family who have fought in the Armed Forces of the United States going back to the Revolutionary War up to today.

Love, William Henry II, Lt., Aide de Camp to General George Washington, lost leg at Battle of Yorktown. (grandfather)

Spray, William Nelson, Lt., fought in the War of 1812. (uncle)


Spray, Frederick Adam, Pfc., lied about his age to join the service to fight in the Spanish-American War. (grandfather)


Spray, John, USN, landed on Normandy, December 6, 1944. (uncle)


Layman, James, Lt., youngest officer in the Union Army, fought in Civil War. (grandfather)


Layman, John Robert, Pfc., fought in Korean War. (brother)


Layman, Curtis Frederick, SP5, fought three tours in Vietnam. Bronze Star, Silver Star, Medal of Commendation. (brother)


Osterhout, George Thomas, Sgt., Union Army, fought in Civil War. (grandfather)


Hall, L.T., Pfc., World War II. (father-in-law)


Hall, Hugo, Pfc. World War II. (uncle)


Lambert, Homer, Pfc.,U.S. Army, French Medal Legion Winner, WW I. (uncle)


Smith, Charles R., Pfc. U.S. Army, WWII. (uncle)


Avery, Pete, NCO.,U.S. Army, WWII. (uncle)


Smart, Randolph, Col., U.S. Air Force, career, served in Viet Nam. (cousin)


Smith, Earl, U.S. Army, WWII, died in battle. (uncle)

Smith, Dale, Col., U.S. Army, served in Korea. (uncle)


Roberts, Ward., U.S. Army Air Corps. Flew reconnaissance and bombing missions over Germany in 1944 and 1945. (uncle)


Ward, Neal, Officer, U.S. Air Force, reconnaissance missions during cold war. (cousin)


Ward, Darrell, Lt. Col. U.S. Army, active. (cousin)


Leigh, U.S. Army, Lost his life on Anzio, buried there (my son-in-law's grandfather)


Cook, Charles, Officer, Tail Gunner, U.S. Army Air Corps, WWII. (brother-in-law)


Cook, Warren B., U.S. Navy, Seabee, WWII. (brother-in-law)


Beam, Ross, U.S. Navy, of Front Royal, Virginia. (nephew)


Kirby, Matt, U.S. Army, career, currently at Ft. Riley, Kansas. (nephew)
Thanks for the read.

Thursday, May 23, 2013

Rich IRS employees don't know nuthin'

This IRS thing bugs the youknowwhat out of me. I just can't let it go. So does the AP scandal and Benghazi mess, as well as the takeover of different agencies in the government by Homeland Security and their personal private army with their 2200 tanks and 1.5 billion rounds of ammunition. There are so many areas of too much government and enough glaring problems to keep me busy reporting on them till the next election.

In that vein, after I wrote about the IRS Director of Exempt Groups (what a stupid title), Lois Lerner, I snooped around the internet a bit more and discovered that this bureaucrat extraordinaire cashed in something north of $750,000 over the past 4 years in salary and bonuses--mostly bonuses. Her salary is about $175,000 a year.

That infuriates me. How can any civil servant become rich?

Think of it.

Richard Nixon was right when he said, "Always follow the money."

Thanks for the read.

Wednesday, May 22, 2013

Lois Lerner's arrogance

I'm trying to remember when I've seen a radical display of haughtiness and hubris as I witnessed this morning when Lois Lerner of the IRS sat before Darrell Issa's committee and basically told them to stuff it because she's taking the Fifth.

She was seething underneath as she conferred with her three or four lawyers, giving the congresspeople the evil eye every chance she got. I've done nothing wrong, she proclaimed, tensing up through her anger. I've been with the IRS more than umpty-umpt years. How dare you question me, an entrenched and loyal Bureaucrat. I know where the bodies are buried because I put them there. I take all the orders from the best of 'em without question, and I'll be hung before I share a thing with you miserable politicians. I'll be here many years after you go back home to your pitiful little lives and boring backwater states.

Of course, the Fifth Amendment is to protect the innocent; why is it only the seemingly guilty use it? Ms. Lerner's inclination to declare the Fifth could indicate she's in deep and followed orders from above like a good  IRS bureaucrat. You don't stay in the Federal Government hierarchy by being a firebrand. You follow directives and orders and get good performance reviews, year after year, "project" after project. And after watching Lerner, it's clear she has earned her big directors salary and bonuses which criteria likely includes being a full on bitch who hates people.

Her IRS colleagues also testifying before the committee, seem to have a propensity for coming off as strange and freaky. They are literal, eely oddballs dispensing inane and silly, sometimes distracted answers to specific questions about the people who were responsible for their IRS mess. If we've heard "I don't know" once we've heard it twenty or thirty times.

Who is in charge? Who does know? Their respective titles are commissioners, directors, deputy this and deputy that; so who the hell gives the orders?  I now understand the term "stonewalling" as they all sit there like stones!

There's more
I heard about a citizen protest that took place in front of the IRS building in St. Louis yesterday. Before you look at the controversial source and dismiss it out of hand--Infowars and Alex Jones--please consider who the protesters are. They are women and men like the rest of us and most of whom probably have never marched in a rally in their lives. For them to come out is major. There's an old marketing axiom: if one person complains, there are thirty who feel that way who do not complain. By that measure, this was a significant turnout.

After realizing the tone of the march and type of protesters, it's important to look at just who was on the sideline in cars marked Homeland Security, Federal Police. What are they doing there? What possible mischief could these folks get into? Throw a hot cup of coffee at an officer? Beat them with a placard? Couldn't the local police handle this? Sounds kinda brown shirty or SS-ey to me.

The scandals plaguing President Obama are getting away from him pretty fast. However, his cover up machine is unpredictable. How far will these scandals go? Will his Dem friends hang on? After all, how would you like to be the first democrat to contemplate impeaching the first black president?

I read that even the First Mrs. wants to get away from the president on an "extended vacation" on Martha's Vineyard this summer. Maybe she can ask Ms. Lerner to go along too. No protesters on the Vineyard!

Thanks for the read.







Tuesday, May 21, 2013

Tornadoes hate conservatives too!

Lizz Winstead--not exactly a household name--who is a "co-creator" of The Daily Show with Jon Stewart, twitter-joked yesterday afternoon that " the Oklahoma tornado clearly targets conservatives."

Chirp.

Chirp.

I guess she tried damage control by apologizing and then giving an assignment to those who were angered and shocked by what she said: just give to the different charities involved in the Oklahoma cleanup and recovery efforts.

Yeah, Lizz; that'll fix it. Typical. A Leftie spending other people's money..

What arrogance

Winstead, who looks a lot like Herman Munster in drag, isn't off the hook. She's having to take the flak she so deserves, yet it looks to me that she still doesn't get it. Nor do her peers who are in constant delight in deriding people who are not in their mix, not of the 1%, beyond their focus, on the margins, the outliers--those people. Those hicks. Those...in other words, people like you and me.

I like to see snide people like Lizz publicly embarrassed. She deserves it.

Caca storms are such fantastic equalizers.

Thanks for the read.




Sunday, May 19, 2013

Where is Hillary?

I've been wondering where Mrs. Clinton has been since she left the State Department a few months ago. She's popped in and out of the public eye long enough to accept a couple of awards; you know the kinds I'm talking about--prestige ones that only really famous people receive for being...well, way above the strait of famous. Usually, "famous" attested by doing lots of different things, e.g., being first lady, being a senator, and finally, being a secretary of state.

Considering those accomplishments started off as a result of her first having married a popular and powerful Democrat politician, it is the ideological default that if she wanted to became famous for being a feminist, she could. After all, we all remember that Tammy Wynette cookie baking moment in her husband's presidential campaign to show people that she's no Stepford Wife.

I have to laugh when people talk about Mrs. Clinton's assent to power and her relationship to feminist and women's issues vis a vis the Democrat Party. The funniest example of the big myth was when the whole Obama campaign machine treated Mrs. Clinton like she was in a steno pool. Obama's people put out the most sexist, racist and ageist presidential primary run in modern history, and Mrs. Clinton took it in the solar plexus. It was the Progressive Dems who turned on her to get the first black man elected president at any cost. When she finally dropped out of the race and supported Obama, I realized just how corrupt these folks are.

But, six years on, Hillary's still going strong and the Obamas are making the predicted mess of things in Washington, which brings us to Mrs. Clinton's whereabouts as we slop through the Benghazi mess. I realize she had the one appearance before congress--the one where she asked, "What difference, at this point, does it make?"

But, now that the whistle blowers have given more testimony regarding Ambassador Stevens' lack of safety and her knowledge of this and other material facts, I'm concerned there is much, much more to be asked of Mrs. Clinton.

Oh, I know, she has errands to run:  face lifts to have, a preemptive (and redemptive?) strike in the form of a book to write; a new life script to reconstruct and memorize; and the most formidable, an old and possibly mentally distressed, oxygen-deprived husband to keep from re-ruining her life.

Let's face it; wherever she is, just being Hillary Clinton is not an easy task. Maybe there's an award for that.

Thanks for the read.

Tuesday, April 30, 2013

Ex-Strapping young Muslim gets laughs

Does anyone notice that many of today's images of Mr. Obama catch him with his tongue stuck in his cheek? I'm wondering if it's a birth defect which is becoming more pronounced the longer he remains president. Like a birth defect that connects with a character defect.

Beneath the the president's dry, tongue in cheek speech at Saturday's annual White House Correspondents Dinner, Mr. Obama must have been waterboarding in irony and what looked like sincere anger toward those he loves to hate.

Mr. President, the Tea Partiers,  Truthers and Birthers are so first term.

I also wonder when Mr. Obama is going to get rid of that 250 year-old racism chip on his shoulder. The manner in which the president seems to want to slay these ubiquitous dragons, you know, the already dead ones such as the old Bush policies,  is just tiresome and tedious, not to mention weird. But, evidently he still gets a good bit of mileage due to the depth at which Bush is disliked among his audiences.

Speaking about the dinner, there were the usual Hollywood/glitterati folks there. The vast wealth in that room must have been staggering. Clooney, Spielberg, Streisand, you name them; they were there. Dumbed down and full of themselves. (And they say Republicans have all the money.) Can Versailles be far away?

It's almost a cliche to even bring up our country's goings on--something so desperate and sad as a fertilizer store fire which killed lots of people or the terrorist Boston bombing. We are in the midst of an strange, economic situation which no one truly understands and is possibly cataclysmic. The same is true regarding our civil rights, which we are losing as fast as I can type this piece and which most people are unaware of or don't care. And if you do write about it, there's a possibility that you're going to be tagged by the Feds for being a troublemaker. I've never felt fearful of writing something--but, today I truly am.

There are huge problems surrounding the health care bill and the aging of America, as 10,000 baby boomers retire daily. We are participating in a $14 trillion dollar debt and we're hemorrhaging money while clowns like Obama pay our enemies to destroy peoples lives in foreign countries.

We've become a country full of law breakers who were inspired by corrupt officials who got away with "it" in the early nineties and now have become more of a rule than the "exception" thanks to people like Bill Clinton who had a way with words and was able to convince others what the meaning of "is" is, and what the true definition of sex is. To say that actions such as these do not affect our young people is ridiculous. Ask any mother of a teenager.

Our local officials are crooks and our teachers have failed miserably to do what they are paid to do. Our kids are locked on to some electronic device that gives them greater pleasure than being locked on to human beings. Something's wrong; everything's wrong and we must fix it, despite this tyrannical, collectivist regime.

But, let's move on.

So what if the leader of the free world has a love fest with all the swells of the world and the media/press that's so into this president they can't even begin to cover his indecent attempt of governing. They wouldn't know where to start. That would be cheating on the one you love. Besides that's a racist thing to think.

Because I and others are calling them all out as abusers of power, demagogic fools who do not perform their jobs, and because we are embarrassed and horrified at the extent of this corruption, we must be considered what "they," the elite in this country, calls "haters." They even have turned on Woodward and now, Brokaw.

In other words, as one of their own so famously retorts,  What difference does it make?

Thanks for the read.





Monday, March 11, 2013

Furloughed joke writers

The president spoke at the annual super elite Gridiron Dinner the other evening about the goings on in his administration and Washington. He stated he didn't have a big bunch of jokes because his joke writers were on furlough.

Chirp.

Chirp.

It's probably okay that he didn't lay a bunch of humor on the audience considering the appalling manifestations that the president's decisions have caused, unbelievably among them, a closed White House. However, they did laugh as only elites can do because in Washington one notices the unemployment rate is not very high. Government has been very good to people in Washington and outlying areas close by.

And then there's this unfortunate part of his speech: the inevitable public humiliation that can only come from a Me president, not a We president as he observed there were a few people not in attendance. He's referring to Bob Woodward who recently pulled Obama's covers on his participatioin in Sequestration. He marginalizes Bob Woodward as a has been by questioning his current abilities, making outright fun of him.

Mr. Obama employs the most insidious little trick in the book by calling out Mr. Woodward's "advanced" age--he's nearing 70. He is intimating that Mr. Woodward is simply prickly and somewhat bitter. Only someone way off the mark, like Woodward, would misunderstand the White House personnel in such an off way.

Again, this display of ageism is something I've come to expect from a president and the people who work for him, along with lies, deception and cover ups. Ageism is the smug, condescending cousin of racism, tokenism and the rest of the isms that keep people apart by a winking/nudging, self-satisfied gang who can't be trusted with anything important or life threatening.

Life goes on
The president did not tell the divine dinner crowd that regardless of the cuts, he and the First Mrs. are continuing their extravagant ways by he going on a vaca and she jumping the D.C. ship of fools for less lugubrious climes, a ski trip in Snowsville. That's the in-your-face kind of arrogance we're sorrily getting used to.

While the White House is closed, unemployment remains high, there's been a huge increase in taxes all around and gas is over $4.50 a gallon, these clowns try to impress each other at their stupid, insipid insiders' dinner.

Thanks for the read.





Friday, March 1, 2013

Failure of duty

Bob Woodward's criticism of the White House's lack of ownership of the Sequestration policy on a public information level, as well as the administration's threats "that he would regret it" if he exposed said facts have turned out much differently than I first dared to think. 

Today, I'm extremely disappointed. Extremely.

And worried and alarmed.

Instead of journalists jumping on Woodward's bandwagon, they have taken personal aim at Mr. Woodward. Ageism was sickeningly obvious at the White House as we listened to David Plouffe's analogy of some baseball pitcher who is over the hill--like Woodward and millions of the rest of us. Another TV twit called him a baby boomer relic who is so over, or close to that--again, like millions of the rest of us. Still another said that when he dies--soon we hope--there will be lots and lots of bad info, FBI/J.Edgar type stuff that affects DC insiders, that will fall to the ground when he croaks.

I should have known they'd go personal

Other media critics actually minimized the issue saying Woodward overreacted, adding they were yelled at all the time by the White House. No big deal. Of course, the rest of us know the results of their "hostile" relationship with the White House. We see it on a daily basis--like the weekend that POTUS was AWOL with Tiger.

This attitude and arrogance is what the country is up against: a quickly developing state run media who will do anything its government bosses want, to anyone its government bosses want to do it to. It pains me to realize that--the thought of it shakes me to the bone.

Our next question has to be why? And of course, what is the motivation? Why would an entire group of mature, supposedly sophisticated, educated  people hang on every morsel and ort of this president? Why the adoration? Is it ideology? Cult of personality? Is the fear of losing access so overpowering that they fawn over the president to the extent they cannot tell the truth? Ego?

Bob Woodward's job has been to attempt to find the answers to such questions for 37 years; and most of time he got to some, if not all, of the truth. 

Mr. Woodward has been beaten on by better than these folks. Although I have trepidation, my cards are on him for the long pull of a nasty fight.

Thanks for the read.

.

Thursday, February 28, 2013

What would Murrow do (WWMD?)

One of my old manuscripts, The Oath of the Fourth Estate, sits unfinished, unedited and mostly unreadable. What I wrote about twenty or so years ago, however--the importance of a free and unfettered press--still stands as we approach one of America's  most disappointing results of today's media as it covers a president who demonstrates that he is convinced he has more latitude to rule (rather than to govern).

WWMD?
The recent war between Bob Woodward, the Reporter Emeritus of the Washington Post and Lanny Davis, former White  House Counsel to Bill Clinton, is precisely what is required to get this current bunch of laid back lip smackers off their backsides and begin asking tough questions.

If only they knew what questions to ask.

Time to dust off the old manuscript.

Thanks for the read.